Sidcup Storyteller
A study of DRDH's hybrid cinema, library & residential building in Sidcup exploring whether it has broader lessons and meanings for public buildings in our suburban town centres.
Originally written for The Architects’ Journal and published in March 2024.
The train from London Bridge to Sidcup runs between the allotments and back gardens of suburban London. Along the way there are occasional glimpses of suburban town centres like Bexleyheath, swollen and densified by recent development, instilling the nagging feeling that some recent regeneration in these sorts of places is at times more responsive to central London journey times than it is to the spirit of the place.
In defining London’s suburbs in this way, we risk eroding those qualities that give London’s peripheral places – of which Sidcup is a prime example – their dignity and quality of life, ultimately robbing London as a whole of much of its oft-celebrated cultural diversity and spatial richness.
What if London’s public sector were more able to support and commission projects in these outer London conditions that combine intensification with genuine investment in place, creating more reasons to be in a place rather than relying on its relationship to somewhere else?
Storyteller, a new building on Sidcup High Street, housing a public library, cinema and private-sale flats, is an answer to this question. Commissioned by the London Borough of Bexley and designed by London and Antwerp-based architect DRDH, it is remarkable not only for its design’s intelligence and generosity but also for the entrepreneurial nature of its procurement.
The site, a former Blockbuster video rental shop on a prominent but unloved corner of the high street, was acquired by the council, which then put together a hybrid brief combining a public library, a commercial cinema and nine private-sale flats, the sale of which has subsidised the project.
The building shares its high street intersection with a police station that’s no longer a police station, a bank that’s no longer a bank, and an estate agent that continues to be an estate agent.
Facing the high street, Storyteller presents a humble, glossily abstract brick frontage reminiscent of the interwar cinema vernacular and its expressively blank elevations. This elevation also ‘finishes off’ the adjacent 1930s former department store by rising to the level of its portico, giving new prominence to the street corner. A red-brick drum creates a recessive corner entrance space in which to shake a brolly or linger on the doorstep.
The side flank of the building, addressing the more traffic-heavy and arterial Elm Road, presents a much more substantial character than the one facing the high street, and one that contains and resolves the expansive windows of the ground-floor library, the windowless boxes of the upper-storey cinema, and the residential windows and balconies of the flats to the rear of the site.
Here and elsewhere, rather than attempt to ‘fix the site’, the scheme seeks to give it a new quality as a focal point of the high street, taking its cues and geometries from its neighbours and creating a new coherence that simultaneously celebrates and challenges what came before.
Internally, the building is made up of spaces that feel alternately institutional and domestic, all sharing a welcoming but open character befitting the building’s multiple programmes. A double-height café space at the front forms a lofty shop window to the high street.
Visitors pass the café on their left as they enter, finding themselves in an almost domestic space: a timber-lined lobby and staircase leading up to a cinema lobby, public room and the three small screening rooms, one of which doubles as a performance space.
Back at ground level, the timber lobby is followed by a sequence of library rooms that are progressively more private and more ‘dug in’ to the site as the road outside rises, culminating in a children’s library and a single window, facing south directly into the branches of a mature holm oak tree.
There is a certain austerity and solemnity to these main rooms but this is lifted by inhabitation and the fact that the rooms are so easily available to the public. We can get right into the heart of the plan, reaching books, toilets (including a Changing Places accessible toilet), a pick ‘n’ mix stand and work tables all before passing a reception desk, lending the whole ground floor an unusually public quality. Throughout, a complex game of size and proportion is playing out. Windows that feel inconsequential from outside are suddenly vast and expansive on the inside, maintaining a close relationship between the library and the street.
When Robert Venturi wrote in 1966 of ‘the obligation to the difficult whole’, he was concerned with finding ways by which the kind of ‘complex and contradictory’ forms and spaces he was pursuing could be accommodated within a coherent building form. His primary example of a successful ‘difficult whole’ was, interestingly, a commercial building on an urban street corner: the Farmers and Merchants Union Bank in Columbus, Wisconsin, by Louis Sullivan. Venturi sees in the bank’s primary elevation a play of symmetries that accommodates the dualities of the building’s internal programme while also providing a symmetrical, centred composition.
Something similar is going on at Storyteller, though the spatial and programmatic complexities of Venturi are replaced here by more powerful social complexities – this is at once a commercial, civic and domestic building. There’s the popular commercialism of the cinema (popcorn machines and free-standing adverts for upcoming features abound); there’s the increasingly complex and vital public offer represented by the library; and then there’s the need to provide uplifting, good quality flats, though the presence of these will be lost to most visitors.
As a public building, Storyteller is chiefly a place to read and to work, but it is also a place for birthday parties and reading groups, a place to pay bills or access council services, and ultimately somewhere for different generations to meet. The three main groups on my visit were parents of young children attending a storytelling session, teenagers doing their half-term coursework, and pensioners chatting and browsing the bookshelves.
Sonic Youth played quietly on the café speakers, vital nattering took place around library desks, and a swarm of laden buggies sat at the edge of the children’s library. As the day rolled on, this sort of thing would be supplemented by after-work cinemagoers sharing circulation and café spaces with library users.
The building does not attempt to express the tensions inherent in such a complex programme but instead is concerned with creating an allusive, integrated and cross-programmed ‘difficult whole’ to make a hybrid public building that feels not only like a place for the communities of Sidcup to meet and be together, but a genuinely new form of public building, particularly in its UK context.
Though both client and architect are reluctant to describe it as an exemplar, given the effort involved in making it happen, it nevertheless feels like a model for how architecture with a public consciousness and an entrepreneurial state can together ‘lift’ a town centre in a way that is responsive to the contemporary needs and challenges of public life. Our communities deserve – need – more of this.



I really enjoyed this. One idea that stayed with me was that the success of Storyteller wasn’t simply architectural, it was commercial, civic and social.
The hybrid procurement approach created opportunities that arguably wouldn’t have existed through a more conventional brief.
It made me wonder whether we spend too much time evaluating projects by the quality of individual disciplines, rather than asking how effectively those disciplines come together to create public value. Perhaps the real measure of success isn’t just a well-designed building, but a procurement and commercial strategy that enables good design to happen in the first place.
Then nod to the 1930s is very appropriate. Dignity is the operative word here, this obviously being a new building that does not make the adjacent buildings jump out of their skin.
And very interesting point about the regeneration of a place not being intended for the passenger of a train, but as a celebration of the local spirit.